Modern editorial flow based on XML JATS

XML JATS

A modern editorial flow: Word to XML JATS, then HTML5, PDF and OJS

An XML-first workflow reduces duplicated tasks, improves consistency and lets editorial teams publish across channels without rebuilding the same article again and again.

When Word, PDF, HTML and OJS all depend on separate manual versions, editorial production slows down. XML JATS creates a cleaner, more dependable route from manuscript to publication.

Why an XML-first flow changes everything

In a traditional PDF-first process, each output becomes its own mini-project. Corrections drift, metadata gets lost and every new format means more duplicated effort. XML JATS solves that by giving the team a structured source from which the necessary outputs can be rendered.

The core stages of the flow

  1. Word preflight: review styles, section logic, equations, tables, figures and references.
  2. XML JATS markup: structure the article using a consistent tagging model.
  3. Validation: check schemas, metadata, reference integrity and editorial rules.
  4. Output generation: create responsive HTML5, lightweight web PDF and print-ready PDF.
  5. Publishing package: prepare files for OJS or the target delivery environment.

What the editorial team gains

  • One reliable source of truth instead of several drifting versions.
  • Cleaner issue closures with fewer manual surprises.
  • Better consistency between article web view, PDF and metadata layer.
  • More predictable timing for publication and post-publication corrections.

Operational benefit

The workflow becomes easier to scale

As volume grows, XML JATS lets the journal increase output without multiplying fragility. That is where the biggest long-term benefit appears.

Why HTML5, PDF and OJS should not be separate worlds

Readers, editors and platforms interact with content differently. A journal needs accessible web reading, dependable downloadable PDFs and a clean structure for indexing and platform integration. XML JATS allows those needs to coexist without breaking coherence.

Where journals usually feel the improvement first

  • Reference corrections become more manageable.
  • Affiliations and ORCID stop being recurring sources of inconsistency.
  • Issue assembly gets faster and less chaotic.
  • Digital outputs feel more aligned and more professional.

Conclusion

An XML-first editorial flow is less about technology for its own sake and more about giving journals a stronger operational backbone. It helps teams publish more cleanly, more confidently and with much less duplication.

Do you have a project in mind?

Tell us what you need and we will help you shape it.

Request a quote → (+34) 699 931 137